ACT 1994 Subaru Impreza HD/Race Rigid 4 Pad Clutch Kit
SKU: 94718809558

ACT 1994 Subaru Impreza HD/Race Rigid 4 Pad Clutch Kit

Sale price$254.25 Regular price$282.50
Save 10%

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 6 - Jul 11

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

ACT 1994 Subaru Impreza HD/Race Rigid 4 Pad Clutch KitSB2 HDR4 kit features ACT's most popular Heavy Duty pressure plate. ACT Heavy Duty pressure plates use exclusive diaphragm design to increase clamp load, reduce deflection and maximize clutch life. All diaphragms endure a four stage, heat treating process for unparalleled performance. ACT pressure plates have precision cover stampings to provide rigidity and consistency. ACT's 4 pad rigid race discs are made with high quality, ceramic friction

SB2-HDR4 kit features ACT's most popular Heavy Duty pressure plate. ACT Heavy Duty pressure plates use exclusive diaphragm design to increase clamp load, reduce deflection and maximize clutch life. All diaphragms endure a four-stage, heat-treating process for unparalleled performance. ACT pressure plates have precision cover stampings to provide rigidity and consistency. ACT's 4-pad rigid race discs are made with high quality, ceramic friction materials. The chrome-moly hub is heat-treated for strength and durability. The lightweight, rigid design allows for quicker shifts and smooth, trouble-free service. With the 4-pad rigid race disc, engagement is harsher, but shifting is faster. The 4-pad rigid race disc is well-suited for the smaller disc sizes in smaller engines.

This Part Fits:

Year Make Model Submodel
2006 Saab 9-2X 2.5i
2005 Saab 9-2X Linear
2003 Subaru Baja Base
2003-2006 Subaru Baja Sport
2016-2017 Subaru Crosstrek Base
2016-2017 Subaru Crosstrek Premium
1998-2002 Subaru Forester Base
1998-2002 Subaru Forester L
1998-2002 Subaru Forester S
2008 Subaru Forester Sports 2.5 X
2003-2013 Subaru Forester X
2009-2013 Subaru Forester X Premium
2003-2005 Subaru Forester XS
2006-2011 Subaru Impreza 2.5i
2010-2011 Subaru Impreza 2.5i Premium
1995,2012-2023 Subaru Impreza Base
1996-1997 Subaru Impreza Brighton
1994-2001 Subaru Impreza L
1994 Subaru Impreza LS
1995-1996 Subaru Impreza LX
1995-2004 Subaru Impreza Outback
2005-2011 Subaru Impreza Outback Sport
2012-2014 Subaru Impreza Premium
1998-2005 Subaru Impreza RS
2017-2023 Subaru Impreza Sport
2012-2016 Subaru Impreza Sport Premium
2002-2004 Subaru Impreza TS
2006-2009 Subaru Legacy 2.5i
2007-2009 Subaru Legacy 2.5i Special Edition
1994 Subaru Legacy Alpine Sport
1990,1995 Subaru Legacy Base
1995-2000 Subaru Legacy Brighton
1994,1997-2004 Subaru Legacy GT
1998,2000-2002 Subaru Legacy GT Limited
2005 Subaru Legacy i
1990-2004 Subaru Legacy L
1999 Subaru Legacy L 30th Anniversary
2004 Subaru Legacy L 35th Anniversary
2003 Subaru Legacy L SE
2005 Subaru Legacy Limited
1999 Subaru Legacy Limited 30th Anniversary
1990-1996 Subaru Legacy LS
1991-1997 Subaru Legacy LSi
1995-1999 Subaru Legacy Outback
1997,1999 Subaru Legacy Outback Limited
1994 Subaru Legacy Outdoor
1995-1998 Subaru Legacy Postal
1994 Subaru Legacy Sun Sport
1999 Subaru Legacy SUS 30th Anniversary
1994 Subaru Legacy Touring
2006-2009 Subaru Outback 2.5i
2007 Subaru Outback 2.5i Basic
2006 Subaru Outback 2.5i Limited
2000-2004,2008 Subaru Outback Base
2005 Subaru Outback i
2000-2005 Subaru Outback Limited
2015 Subaru XV Crosstrek Base
2013-2015 Subaru XV Crosstrek Premium
Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 94718809558

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.2 ★★★★★
Based on 1876 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
E
Verified Purchase
erika
Natrona Heights, US
★★★★★ 4
They are good
They were really good with nice flavor just not sour
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on September 20, 2023
P
Verified Purchase
paige alexander
Massapequa, US
★★★★★ 5
Tasty
Yummy.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 7, 2026
S
Verified Purchase
slimwriter
Natrona Heights, US
★★★★★ 2
Not sour
Not really sour at all so it’s a pretty disappointing candy.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 6, 2026
M
Verified Purchase
Moon Riley
Boise, US
★★★★★ 5
Sugar free
Tastes great
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 21, 2026
M
Verified Purchase
Mr. Paul A. Ackermann
New York, US
★★★★★ 5
Dude, it's not just a horror novel
Format: Paperback
This is to the previous reviewer (C. Scanlan). If this is just a horror novel, it failed miserably. It is not exactly a blood ’n gore thriller. Compared to Stephen King, it is pretty tame. What puts the horror in this book is that it is social commentary. Mary Shelly is not just trying to scare us. It is more than just a “Friday the 13th” movie. Mary Shelly is delivering a message. It seems that everyone understands this except this reviewer. There have been several different interpretations of the novel (see [...] for 10 different meanings of the novel). ICE takes the interpretation that Shelly is saying science can go too far. This is a perfectly valid interpretation. One can disagree with this interpretation but let’s not resort to name calling and personal attacks – that those who hold such an interpretation are doing a “low level attempt to cash in on home schooling Christian paranoia and fear of health care” or believe that “AIDS [is] the fruit of sin”. My wife and I are Catholic parents and we sent our children to public schools He mocks the idea of a secular fundamentalist but then demonstrates what that is. A religious fundamentalist sees anyone who disagrees with him as being of the devil. A secular fundamentalist sees anyone who disagrees with him as guilty of “brainwashing” others. In both cases, true dialogue is impossible. Another thing that a fundamentalist does is that he sees things in opposite extremes. If you are warning of the dangers of trusting too much in science then you must be against science. There is no middle ground for the fundamentalist. If you see that science can sometimes go too far then that means you are against health care. But this is a non-sequitur. Nielson writes “Frankenstein’s placing of the creation of life within the scientific method first destroys the unrepeatability and systematically eliminates the other elements [of hope, love, beauty, creativity and sacrifice]”. Nielson is not criticizing the scientific method in total. He is only criticizing it in the creation of life. The reviewer writes “He thereby easily and explicitly condemns the whole process and philosophy of the scientific method”. But Nielson is not condemning the whole process of the scientific method. He is only condemning it in the creation of life. The reviewer then mocks the credentials of the critics in the book - “So who are these essayists superior to Norton's and Oxfords and free of deconstructionist feminist secular fundamentalism, experts so august Ignatius should want them mentioned on their product page yet are nowhere to be seen?” But this game can be played both ways. What are the credentials of this reviewer? Is this reviewer so august as to challenge these essayists? Again, this is merely an ad-hominem attack. I really do not care who has the best credentials. What matters is who makes sense. Sometimes intellectuals can make the dumbest claims. Read Paul Johnson’s book, “Intellectuals” (http://www.amazon.com/Intellectuals-Marx-Tolstoy-Sartre-Chomsky/dp/0061253170/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1421862888&sr=8-1&keywords=intellectuals). He compares the essayists unfavorably to “good solid Roman Catholic moral theology” from the likes of Richard A. McCormick S.J., who “is the renowned leader of Roman Catholic Moral Theology in the field of bioethics in the USA.” He overlooks the fact that A. McCormick S.J. has dissented from teachings of the Popes Paul VI, John Paul II, and Benedict XVI over contraception. The “renowned leader” in the Catholic Church in morality is first and foremost the pope. Since Richard A. McCormick has contradicted the popes, he cannot be a good solid Catholic theologian. Mary Shelly lived right after the Enlightenment – man is the measure of all things. She lived at a time when people believed that science will solve all our problems. This is called scientism. ICE contends that Shelly is saying that we may be expecting too much from science. It does not mean that Shelly was saying that we should reject science. And it does not mean that Shelly believes that we should go back to the Catholic faith. In fact, ICE acknowledges that Shelly was an anti-Catholic. But the Church believes that the kernel of truth can be found in others, even in anti-Catholics. This is part of the Catholic tradition. St Augustine learned from Plato and St Aquinas learned from Aristotle. ICE would take that kernel of truth and expound that with the fullness of the Catholic faith. You may disagree with the Catholic faith, or with ICE looking at Shelly’s book from a Catholic perspective. But this is at least as a legitimate an interpretation as any other. In fact, this interpretation seems closer to the truth than the others. This interpretation is the traditional interpretation, which means that it goes back further to Shelly’s time than the modern interpretations, and is therefore less likely to be in error. BTW, the reviewer wrote that “Opus Dei right wing publishing (or reprint) house is selling this novel is to milk the home school market and to support its own bizarre bio-ethical ideology”. This is factually wrong. The company that publishes Opus Dei’s books is Sceptre. But the publisher of ICE is Ignatius Press.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 22, 2015

recommand products