aFe MagnumFLOW Air Filters OER P5R A/F P5R GM Cars & Trucks 92-05
SKU: 30899782939

aFe MagnumFLOW Air Filters OER P5R A/F P5R GM Cars & Trucks 92-05

Sale price$79.20 Regular price$88.00
Save 10%

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 6 - Jul 11

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

aFe MagnumFLOW Air Filters OER P5R A/F P5R GM Cars & Trucks 92-05Constructed with 100 percent polyurethane boxed frame, this high flow, oiled OE replacement performance filter will outflow the stock filter for improved horsepower and torque. Five layers of progressively finer mesh cotton gauze media provide maximum airflow for best performance results. Washable and reusable for multiple cleaning cycles, the tall open evenly spaced pleats provide excellent dust holding capacity for longer service cycle between

Constructed with 100-percent polyurethane boxed frame, this high flow, oiled OE replacement performance filter will outflow the stock filter for improved horsepower and torque. Five layers of progressively finer mesh cotton gauze media provide maximum airflow for best performance results. Washable and reusable for multiple cleaning cycles, the tall open evenly spaced pleats provide excellent dust holding capacity for longer service cycle between cleanings. Integrated urethane bump seal insures tight, no leak seal over the life of the filter.

This Part Fits:

Year Make Model Submodel
1992-2005 Chevrolet Astro Base
1992-1995 Chevrolet Astro CL
1992-1995 Chevrolet Astro CS
1996-2005 Chevrolet Astro LS
1992-2005 Chevrolet Astro LT
1995-1999,2005 Chevrolet Blazer Base
1996-2004 Chevrolet Blazer LS
1995-2001 Chevrolet Blazer LT
1999-2001 Chevrolet Blazer Trailblazer
2001-2005 Chevrolet Blazer Xtreme
2003-2005 Chevrolet Blazer ZR2
1993-1997 Chevrolet Camaro Base
1993 Chevrolet Camaro Indianapolis 500 Pace Car
1996-1997 Chevrolet Camaro RS
1993-1997 Chevrolet Camaro Z28
1994-2003 Chevrolet S10 Base
1994-2004 Chevrolet S10 LS
1994-1998 Chevrolet S10 SS
1999-2003 Chevrolet S10 Xtreme
1994-2003 Chevrolet S10 ZR2
2002-2004 Chevrolet S10 ZR5
1992-1994 Chevrolet S10 Blazer Base
1994 Chevrolet S10 Blazer LT
1992 Chevrolet S10 Blazer Sport
1992-1994 Chevrolet S10 Blazer Tahoe
1992-1994 Chevrolet S10 Blazer Tahoe LT
1992-1996 GMC Jimmy Base
2000-2001 GMC Jimmy Diamond Edition
1998-2000 GMC Jimmy Envoy
1995-1999,2001 GMC Jimmy SL
1992-2001 GMC Jimmy SLE
1993-2001 GMC Jimmy SLS
1992-2001 GMC Jimmy SLT
1992-1997,2003-2005 GMC Safari Base
1993 GMC Safari GT
1995-2002 GMC Safari SL
1992-2005 GMC Safari SLE
1992-2005 GMC Safari SLT
1994-1998 GMC Safari SLX
1992-1993 GMC Sonoma Base
1992 GMC Sonoma GT
1994-2004 GMC Sonoma SL
1992-2001 GMC Sonoma SLE
1993-2004 GMC Sonoma SLS
1991 GMC Syclone Base
1992-1993 GMC Typhoon Base
1996-2000 Isuzu Hombre S
1996-2000 Isuzu Hombre XS
1992-1994,1996-2001 Oldsmobile Bravada Base
1993-1997 Pontiac Firebird Base
1993-1997 Pontiac Firebird Formula
1993-1997 Pontiac Firebird Trans Am
1994 Pontiac Firebird Trans Am GT
Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 30899782939

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.8 ★★★★★
Based on 1647 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
E
Verified Purchase
erika
Cuba, US
★★★★★ 4
They are good
They were really good with nice flavor just not sour
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on September 20, 2023
P
Verified Purchase
paige alexander
Birmingham, US
★★★★★ 5
Tasty
Yummy.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 7, 2026
S
Verified Purchase
slimwriter
Cuba, US
★★★★★ 2
Not sour
Not really sour at all so it’s a pretty disappointing candy.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 6, 2026
M
Verified Purchase
Moon Riley
Port Orchard, US
★★★★★ 5
Sugar free
Tastes great
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 21, 2026
M
Verified Purchase
Mr. Paul A. Ackermann
Port Orchard, US
★★★★★ 5
Dude, it's not just a horror novel
Format: Paperback
This is to the previous reviewer (C. Scanlan). If this is just a horror novel, it failed miserably. It is not exactly a blood ’n gore thriller. Compared to Stephen King, it is pretty tame. What puts the horror in this book is that it is social commentary. Mary Shelly is not just trying to scare us. It is more than just a “Friday the 13th” movie. Mary Shelly is delivering a message. It seems that everyone understands this except this reviewer. There have been several different interpretations of the novel (see [...] for 10 different meanings of the novel). ICE takes the interpretation that Shelly is saying science can go too far. This is a perfectly valid interpretation. One can disagree with this interpretation but let’s not resort to name calling and personal attacks – that those who hold such an interpretation are doing a “low level attempt to cash in on home schooling Christian paranoia and fear of health care” or believe that “AIDS [is] the fruit of sin”. My wife and I are Catholic parents and we sent our children to public schools He mocks the idea of a secular fundamentalist but then demonstrates what that is. A religious fundamentalist sees anyone who disagrees with him as being of the devil. A secular fundamentalist sees anyone who disagrees with him as guilty of “brainwashing” others. In both cases, true dialogue is impossible. Another thing that a fundamentalist does is that he sees things in opposite extremes. If you are warning of the dangers of trusting too much in science then you must be against science. There is no middle ground for the fundamentalist. If you see that science can sometimes go too far then that means you are against health care. But this is a non-sequitur. Nielson writes “Frankenstein’s placing of the creation of life within the scientific method first destroys the unrepeatability and systematically eliminates the other elements [of hope, love, beauty, creativity and sacrifice]”. Nielson is not criticizing the scientific method in total. He is only criticizing it in the creation of life. The reviewer writes “He thereby easily and explicitly condemns the whole process and philosophy of the scientific method”. But Nielson is not condemning the whole process of the scientific method. He is only condemning it in the creation of life. The reviewer then mocks the credentials of the critics in the book - “So who are these essayists superior to Norton's and Oxfords and free of deconstructionist feminist secular fundamentalism, experts so august Ignatius should want them mentioned on their product page yet are nowhere to be seen?” But this game can be played both ways. What are the credentials of this reviewer? Is this reviewer so august as to challenge these essayists? Again, this is merely an ad-hominem attack. I really do not care who has the best credentials. What matters is who makes sense. Sometimes intellectuals can make the dumbest claims. Read Paul Johnson’s book, “Intellectuals” (http://www.amazon.com/Intellectuals-Marx-Tolstoy-Sartre-Chomsky/dp/0061253170/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1421862888&sr=8-1&keywords=intellectuals). He compares the essayists unfavorably to “good solid Roman Catholic moral theology” from the likes of Richard A. McCormick S.J., who “is the renowned leader of Roman Catholic Moral Theology in the field of bioethics in the USA.” He overlooks the fact that A. McCormick S.J. has dissented from teachings of the Popes Paul VI, John Paul II, and Benedict XVI over contraception. The “renowned leader” in the Catholic Church in morality is first and foremost the pope. Since Richard A. McCormick has contradicted the popes, he cannot be a good solid Catholic theologian. Mary Shelly lived right after the Enlightenment – man is the measure of all things. She lived at a time when people believed that science will solve all our problems. This is called scientism. ICE contends that Shelly is saying that we may be expecting too much from science. It does not mean that Shelly was saying that we should reject science. And it does not mean that Shelly believes that we should go back to the Catholic faith. In fact, ICE acknowledges that Shelly was an anti-Catholic. But the Church believes that the kernel of truth can be found in others, even in anti-Catholics. This is part of the Catholic tradition. St Augustine learned from Plato and St Aquinas learned from Aristotle. ICE would take that kernel of truth and expound that with the fullness of the Catholic faith. You may disagree with the Catholic faith, or with ICE looking at Shelly’s book from a Catholic perspective. But this is at least as a legitimate an interpretation as any other. In fact, this interpretation seems closer to the truth than the others. This interpretation is the traditional interpretation, which means that it goes back further to Shelly’s time than the modern interpretations, and is therefore less likely to be in error. BTW, the reviewer wrote that “Opus Dei right wing publishing (or reprint) house is selling this novel is to milk the home school market and to support its own bizarre bio-ethical ideology”. This is factually wrong. The company that publishes Opus Dei’s books is Sceptre. But the publisher of ICE is Ignatius Press.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 22, 2015

recommand products